Democrats Eye Senate Opportunities in Kansas, Texas and Other Republican-Leaning States
publishers 16articles 19first reported 23 Sep, 13:30 UTCdeveloping since 22 Sep · 10 editions
Democrats are increasingly focusing on Senate contests in traditionally Republican states, including Kansas and Texas, as analysts describe the fight for control of the chamber as highly competitive.
Politico reported that Senate Democrats’ main super PAC is “actively thinking” about spending in Kansas, while CNN described Democrats as pursuing a potential upset there. The Cook Political Report said three Senate races had shifted toward Democrats and characterized the overall battle for the chamber as a toss-up. The Washington Post, Vox and New York Magazine also highlighted improving Democratic prospects and the emergence of competitive candidates in Republican-leaning states.
In Texas, Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico is making Christian faith a central part of his campaign, according to NPR. Talarico, a state representative, former middle school teacher and seminary student, has used biblical teachings to advocate for policies involving health care and economic opportunity.
Other Democratic congressional candidates, including clergy running in Kansas and Iowa, are similarly emphasizing religion in competitive races. Republicans have sharply criticized that rhetoric. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick accused Talarico of blasphemy, while Talarico responded that denying health care to fund tax cuts for billionaires was “the real blasphemy.”
HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE
Written from 8 articles, 1 with the publisher's own text; 8 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 36 h after the record first saw the story; the editor kept it as written.
- Publishers
- 16
- Source articles
- 19
- Given to the writer
- 8, 1 with the article's own text
- Independent newsrooms
- 8
- This version written
- 36 h after the record first saw the story
- Second model (editor)
- kept as written
- Publication gate
- passed
- Human review
- none
Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →