Supreme Court temporarily allows expanded voter-citizenship database
publishers 26articles 27first reported 24 Sep, 21:26 UTCdeveloping since 25 Sep · 6 editions
The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily allowed the Trump administration to use an expanded federal database to help states check voters’ citizenship while litigation over the system continues.
The court’s emergency order lifted a lower-court restriction on the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, known as SAVE. Created to verify the immigration or citizenship status of applicants for public benefits, SAVE was expanded in 2025 to support bulk searches using Social Security data. States may choose whether to use the system.
The court said federal law permits DHS to seek citizenship and immigration information from other agencies. Its order does not resolve the underlying legal challenge. Federal law also generally prohibits broad voter-roll purges within 90 days of an election, although states may still investigate individual registrations.
The court’s three liberal justices dissented. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote that disenfranchising even a small number of eligible voters would outweigh the government’s harm from being temporarily prevented from using a system it may lack authority to operate.
Voting-rights groups say SAVE may rely on outdated or inaccurate citizenship records and could wrongly flag eligible voters. The administration argues that the program helps states verify voter eligibility. A federal district judge had previously found that the expanded system violated Americans’ privacy rights, and an appeals court had left that ruling in place before the Supreme Court intervened.
HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE
Written from 8 articles, 4 with the publisher's own text; 8 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 36 h after the record first saw the story; the editor kept it as written.
- Publishers
- 26
- Source articles
- 27
- Given to the writer
- 8, 4 with the article's own text
- Independent newsrooms
- 8
- This version written
- 36 h after the record first saw the story
- Second model (editor)
- kept as written
- Publication gate
- passed
- Human review
- none
Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →