Supreme Court Allows Expanded Citizenship Database Use Ahead of Midterms
publishers 67articles 71first reported 25 Sep, 15:40 UTCdeveloping since 25 Sep · 7 editionstop 25 #10
The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to use an expanded federal database to help state and local officials check voter eligibility ahead of the midterm elections, lifting a lower-court order that had blocked the effort.
The 6-3 decision permits the Department of Homeland Security to use and expand the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements database, known as SAVE, while litigation continues. The system, originally used to determine whether noncitizens qualified for government benefits, now incorporates immigration and Social Security records for citizenship screening. The ruling does not resolve the underlying dispute over whether the administration may lawfully use the system to review voter rolls.
The court’s unsigned majority opinion said the lower-court order impeded federal efforts to assist state and local agencies in administering the elections. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that the risk of burdening or disenfranchising lawful voters outweighed any harm to the government from being temporarily prevented from using the system.
Election-security specialists and voting-rights advocates say SAVE can rely on outdated records and may incorrectly identify naturalized citizens as noncitizens. A federal district judge who blocked the program in June said the administration had combined personal and citizenship information it knew could be unreliable. The New York Times reported that the ruling’s practical effect on voter screening during the midterms could be limited.
HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE
Written from 8 articles, headlines and summaries only; 8 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 16 h after the record first saw the story; the editor kept it as written.
- Publishers
- 67
- Source articles
- 71
- Given to the writer
- 8, headlines and summaries only
- Independent newsrooms
- 8
- This version written
- 16 h after the record first saw the story
- Second model (editor)
- kept as written
- Publication gate
- passed
- Human review
- none
Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →