EDITION OF FRI 2 OCT 2026
91 · U.S.

AP-NORC poll finds broad dissatisfaction with Trump on prices and economy

publishers 15articles 18first reported 1 Oct, 10:45 UTCdeveloping since 1 Oct · 2 editions

Most U.S. adults blame President Donald Trump’s policies for higher-than-usual prices and disapprove of his handling of major economic and foreign-policy issues, according to an AP-NORC poll released Thursday.

The survey found that 65% of adults attributed elevated prices to Trump’s policies, while 69% said his handling of the cost of living had been worse than expected. That included 52% of Republicans, although 67% of Republicans said high prices were caused by factors beyond the president’s control.

More than half of respondents said the country, the national economy and their local economy had worsened since Trump was reelected in 2025. Forty-six percent said they and their families were worse off since his second administration began, and 73% said the country was heading in the wrong direction.

On trade, 68% disapproved of Trump’s negotiations with other countries and 64% said his new tariffs had gone too far. His immigration ratings were comparatively stronger: 39% approved of his handling of the issue, while 48% said it had gone worse than expected and 23% said it had gone better.

The poll also found 71% disapproved of Trump’s handling of Iran, while 69% said the war in Iran had not been worth fighting. Only 17% of adults said Trump keeps his promises.

AP-NORC surveyed 2,140 adults nationwide from Sept. 24-28 using online and telephone interviews. The margin of sampling error was plus or minus 2.9 percentage points.

HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE

Written from 8 articles, 1 with the publisher's own text; 6 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 8 h after the record first saw the story; the editor kept it as written.

Publishers
15
Source articles
18
Given to the writer
8, 1 with the article's own text
Independent newsrooms
6
This version written
8 h after the record first saw the story
Second model (editor)
kept as written
Publication gate
passed
Human review
none

Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →

NAMED IN THE COVERAGE

OUTLETS CARRYING THE STORY, RUN BY RUN

0 7 15 2 Oct

WHAT HELD, WHAT CAME LATER

From the first reports to the latest

  • Nothing ran from the first third of the coverage to the last.

Entered the story later

  • Nothing new took hold after the first third.

HOW THIS STORY DEVELOPED: EVERY HEADLINE, EVERY OUTLET →