EDITION OF FRI 2 OCT 2026
68 · WORLD

Naomi Campbell overturns five-year charity trustee ban

publishers 19articles 20first reported 1 Oct, 10:15 UTCdeveloping since 1 Oct · 2 editions

Naomi Campbell has won a legal challenge against a five-year ban on serving as a charity trustee after a tribunal found that serious misconduct at Fashion for Relief had been concealed from her.

The Charity Commission, which regulates charities in England and Wales, disqualified Campbell in 2024 following an investigation into the charity she founded. The commission accused her of abdicating her responsibilities amid governance failures and misuse of funds, including spending on a five-star Cannes hotel, spa treatments, room service and cigarettes. It also identified £316,000 in unauthorised fees and travel expenses paid to fellow trustee Bianka Hellmich.

In a judgment issued Thursday, the tribunal said the most serious misconduct—including unauthorised payments, poor financial management and misuse of funds—resulted from Hellmich’s conduct and was hidden from Campbell. The judges found that Hellmich used forged documents and deceived Campbell, professional advisers and the Charity Commission.

The tribunal said Campbell was not involved in and did not know about that conduct. Although she shared responsibility for the charity’s failure to file accounts on time, the judges concluded that this did not make her unfit to serve as a trustee, given the sustained deception.

Campbell told a four-day hearing in June that her “only mistake” was trusting Hellmich, whom she accused of forging her signature and falsely claiming credentials as a charity lawyer. Hellmich previously told The Guardian there was “absolutely no truth” to Campbell’s allegations. Hellmich was disqualified for nine years, while another trustee, Veronica Chou, received a four-year ban.

HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE

Written from 4 articles, headlines and summaries only; 4 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 8 h after the record first saw the story; the editor kept it as written.

Publishers
19
Source articles
20
Given to the writer
4, headlines and summaries only
Independent newsrooms
4
This version written
8 h after the record first saw the story
Second model (editor)
kept as written
Publication gate
passed
Human review
none

Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →

OUTLETS CARRYING THE STORY, RUN BY RUN

0 9 19 2 Oct

WHAT HELD, WHAT CAME LATER

From the first reports to the latest

  • Nothing ran from the first third of the coverage to the last.

Entered the story later

  • Nothing new took hold after the first third.

HOW THIS STORY DEVELOPED: EVERY HEADLINE, EVERY OUTLET →