India’s Supreme Court seeks Election Commission response on voter-roll revision
publishers 45articles 141first reported 5 Oct, 17:52 UTCdeveloping since 5 Oct · 28 editions
India’s Supreme Court on Thursday sought responses from the Election Commission and its three commissioners to a petition by opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and other INDIA bloc lawmakers challenging the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The petition alleges irregularities in the revision and seeks an independent audit of voter deletions, disclosure of internal Election Commission records and an interim suspension of the exercise. The Hindu reported that the opposition also requested files, meeting records and objections logged by election commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The court said it would hear the case alongside other pending challenges concerning the revision.
In a separate proceeding, the court issued notices to the Congress, Gandhi and other INDIA bloc leaders over their October 12 march toward the Supreme Court. Four lawyers who filed that petition asked for rules governing protests and processions near the court, arguing that the march amounted to pressure on the judiciary. Chief Justice Surya Kant said the judiciary could not be browbeaten.
The march was part of demonstrations demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation. Gandhi on Wednesday accused police of mistreating students involved in recent protests and urged participants to preserve videos and photographs as evidence.
The BJP rejected Gandhi’s characterization of the demonstrations as “political resistance.” Party spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari accused him of encouraging disorder under the guise of democratic protest.
HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE
Written from 8 articles, 5 with the publisher's own text; 6 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 240 h after the record first saw the story; the editor revised it.
- Publishers
- 45
- Source articles
- 141
- Given to the writer
- 8, 5 with the article's own text
- Independent newsrooms
- 6
- This version written
- 240 h after the record first saw the story
- Second model (editor)
- revised
- Publication gate
- passed
- Human review
- none
WHAT THE EDITOR DID
The second model checked the writer's draft against the same sources and changed it before publication. Struck words were in the draft; underlined words are its corrections.
WHAT IT FLAGGED editor revise: Delete the unsupported statement about the adjudication status of the police-abuse allegations. - "Police-abuse allegations have not been independently adjudicated.": None of the sources states whether the allegations have been independently adjudicated.
THE DRAFT AND THE CHANGES
India’s Supreme Court seeks Election Commission response on voter-roll revision
India’s Supreme Court on Thursday sought responses from the Election Commission and its three commissioners to a petition by opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and other INDIA bloc lawmakers challenging the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The petition alleges irregularities in the revision and seeks an independent audit of voter deletions, disclosure of internal Election Commission records and an interim suspension of the exercise. The Hindu reported that the opposition also requested files, meeting records and objections logged by election commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. The court said it would hear the case alongside other pending challenges concerning the revision.
In a separate proceeding, the court issued notices to the Congress, Gandhi and other INDIA bloc leaders over their October 12 march toward the Supreme Court. Four lawyers who filed that petition asked for rules governing protests and processions near the court, arguing that the march amounted to pressure on the judiciary. Chief Justice Surya Kant said the judiciary could not be browbeaten.
The march was part of demonstrations demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation. Gandhi on Wednesday accused police of mistreating students involved in recent protests and urged participants to preserve videos and photographs as evidence. Police-abuse allegations have not been independently adjudicated.
The BJP rejected Gandhi’s characterization of the demonstrations as “political resistance.” Party spokesperson Pradeep Bhandari accused him of encouraging disorder under the guise of democratic protest.
Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →