Supreme Court leaves block on transgender prison health policy in place
publishers 92articles 169first reported 3 Oct, 09:00 UTCdeveloping since 3 Oct · 30 editions
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected the Trump administration’s emergency request to enforce a Bureau of Prisons policy ending hormone therapy, surgeries and social accommodations for federal inmates with gender dysphoria.
The unsigned, one-sentence order left intact lower-court rulings that temporarily blocked the policy. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas said they would have allowed the administration to implement it.
The policy followed an executive order President Donald Trump issued upon returning to office that barred federal support for treatments intended to conform an inmate’s appearance to the opposite sex. The Bureau of Prisons subsequently said it would continue psychotherapy and psychiatric services but stop hormone treatments, surgeries and accommodations such as makeup, wigs and binders.
Three federal prisoners challenged the change, saying they had received hormone therapy for years and arguing that nearly 1,000 inmates could lose treatment. A federal appeals court concluded that the policy was likely arbitrary and capricious because the bureau had not adequately considered its prior experience providing gender-affirming care.
The administration argued that the restrictions were needed to address institutional security and prison-management concerns. Li Nowlin-Sohl, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing the inmates, called the Supreme Court’s decision critical for transgender people in federal custody and said the group would continue defending access to medically necessary care.
HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE
Written from 8 articles, 8 with the publisher's own text; 8 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 438 h after the record first saw the story; the editor kept it as written.
- Publishers
- 92
- Source articles
- 169
- Given to the writer
- 8, 8 with the article's own text
- Independent newsrooms
- 8
- This version written
- 438 h after the record first saw the story
- Second model (editor)
- kept as written
- Publication gate
- passed
- Human review
- none
WHAT THE EDITOR DID
The second model checked the writer's draft against the same sources and published it as written.
Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →