Alaska Senate race roiled by allegations over second Dan Sullivan on ballot
publishers 20articles 28first reported 29 Oct, 11:27 UTCdeveloping since 29 Oct · 4 editions
Alaska officials and the U.S. Justice Department are investigating allegations that Democratic operatives helped recruit a candidate named Dan Sullivan to run against Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan in the state’s closely contested Senate election.
The New York Times reported that people connected to Democratic candidate Mary Peltola’s campaign and senior Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee aides sought candidates who could draw support from the incumbent, including retired teacher Dan J. Sullivan. The report cited communications and interviews with people involved in or aware of the effort. NPR and the BBC said they had not independently verified the allegations.
Peltola denied knowing about the other Sullivan’s candidacy. “I am not interested in tricking voters,” she said Thursday. Her campaign and the DSCC have denied involvement, while Dan J. Sullivan has previously said running was his own decision.
Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy directed Alaska’s Department of Public Safety to determine whether state laws were violated and whether criminal charges or civil action are warranted. The Justice Department has also begun issuing subpoenas to Democratic officials allegedly connected to the recruitment effort, CBS News reported. No charges had been filed as of Friday morning.
The Justice Department had already sued to delay certification if the incumbent loses by a narrow margin, citing possible confusion caused by the two similarly named candidates. It amended that complaint after the Times report. Election-law experts cited by NPR have criticized the federal case as weak. The Alaska Supreme Court ruled in June that Dan J. Sullivan could remain on the general-election ballot.
HOW THIS STORY WAS MADE
Written from 8 articles, 3 with the publisher's own text; 7 independent newsrooms once syndicated copies count as one; this version written 30 h after the record first saw the story; the editor kept it as written.
- Publishers
- 20
- Source articles
- 28
- Given to the writer
- 8, 3 with the article's own text
- Independent newsrooms
- 7
- This version written
- 30 h after the record first saw the story
- Second model (editor)
- kept as written
- Publication gate
- passed
- Human review
- none
WHAT THE EDITOR DID
The second model checked the writer's draft against the same sources and published it as written.
Written by a language model from the sources above, then checked by a second model that may only cut, attribute or correct. How it works →